<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/feed.php?rdf=17">
		<title>Rochester, NY News and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?NewsSectionId=17</link>
		<description></description>
		<dc:date>2010-09-06T13:43:39-05:00</dc:date>
		<dc:rights>Copyright © and Trademark ™ 2007-2009 All Rights Reserved</dc:rights>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=537" />
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=534" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>


	<item rdf:about="http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=537">
		<title>Anatomy of a Bureaucratic Blow-Off</title>
		<link>http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=537</link>
		<dc:date>2010-07-27T16:36:32-05:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><strong>July 28, 2010</strong></em>&nbsp; As some residents spent the last year running for school board and considering the issue of mayoral control, other residents were engaged in something more mundane -- but important to them: trying to get the city of Rochester to respond to basic code violations in their neighborhood. The <em>Smugtown Beacon</em> has acquired the email correspondence between a neighborhood group and their Neighborhood Service Center coordinator, Jose Cruz. In these communications, it is clear that the "buck stops here" is not a philosophy distributed uniformly throughout the city administration. If this is how the city responds to residents asking for code enforcement, how will it treat parents concerned about their child's school? Food for thought...<br />]]></description>
	</item>

	<item rdf:about="http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=534">
		<title>Let the Petition Challenges Begin!</title>
		<link>http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=534</link>
		<dc:date>2010-07-19T19:41:04-05:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>July 20, 2010</strong> With the legal deadline passed for candidates to submit nominating petitions, we now know who is REALLY seeking office in 2010. What we do not yet know is how many of these would-be candidates will actually make it on to a September or November ballot. Inside, an interim look at who's running -- and who's not.]]></description>
	</item>

</rdf:RDF>
